> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/.spec_system/specs/phase24-session05-scrying-and-alert-focus/security-compliance.md).

# Security & Compliance Report

**Session ID**: `phase24-session05-scrying-and-alert-focus` **Package**: `apps/web` **Reviewed**: 2026-07-08 **Result**: PASS

## Scope

**Files reviewed** (session deliverables only):

* `apps/web/src/lib/scryingAndAlertFocus.ts` - pure scrying posture and alert-focus derivation.
* `apps/web/src/components/battlefield/ScryingAndAlertFocusLayer.tsx` - board layer for scrying markers, alert ring, and accessible summaries.
* `apps/web/src/components/battlefield/Battlefield.tsx` - battlefield wiring, shared clock, and hero-token channeling state.
* `apps/web/src/index.css` - scrying, alert focus, and reduced-motion presentation styles.
* `apps/web/tests/scryingAndAlertFocus.test.ts` - helper coverage for threshold, focus, labels, and calm-silence behavior.
* `apps/web/tests/Battlefield.test.tsx` - component coverage for scrying and alert-focus behavior.
* `apps/web/tests/BattlefieldInteraction.test.tsx` - reduced-motion and accessible-state coverage.

**Review method**: Static analysis of session deliverables, changed-file inventory, secret scan, targeted product-label inspection, and focused/full test evidence.

**Review evidence**:

* Command/check: `git diff --name-only caf2ab1abefa4f6cb997a9ac4970600de9582957; git ls-files --others --exclude-standard`
  * Result: PASS - changed runtime files are scoped to `apps/web`; session artifacts and `.spec_system/state.json` are the only non-runtime changes.
  * Evidence: listed 12 session files, including 7 declared deliverables.
* Command/check: `npm run security:secrets`
  * Result: PASS - secret scan completed successfully.
  * Evidence: `Secret scan passed (2282 tracked text files checked).`
* Command/check: `rg -n "localStorage|sessionStorage|fetch\(|WebSocket|new EventSource|indexedDB|document\.cookie|protocol|route|reward|xp|loot|trusted" apps/web/src/lib/scryingAndAlertFocus.ts apps/web/src/components/battlefield/ScryingAndAlertFocusLayer.tsx apps/web/src/components/battlefield/Battlefield.tsx apps/web/src/index.css`
  * Result: PASS - no session-introduced storage, route, network, reward, or trusted-erasure behavior was found.
  * Evidence: matches were limited to type imports and component identifiers; no runtime persistence or external transfer path was introduced.
* Command/check: Targeted inspection of `safeLabel`, `ScryingAndAlertFocusLayer`, and `buildHeroAriaLabel`
  * Result: PASS - visible and accessible labels are bounded, product-facing, and do not render raw mission prompts when a hero is channeling.
  * Evidence: labels use `safeLabel`; scrying aria text uses `active mission channeling`; alert labels are capped by `ALERT_FOCUS_LABEL_MAX_LENGTH`.
* Command/check: `npm test -- apps/web/tests/scryingAndAlertFocus.test.ts apps/web/tests/Battlefield.test.tsx apps/web/tests/BattlefieldInteraction.test.tsx`
  * Result: PASS - focused tests passed.
  * Evidence: 3 test files passed, 49 tests passed.

## Security Assessment

### Overall: PASS

| Category                      | Status | Severity | Details                                                                                                     |
| ----------------------------- | ------ | -------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Injection (SQLi, CMDi, LDAPi) | PASS   | --       | No SQL, shell execution, LDAP, or query construction was introduced in session deliverables.                |
| Hardcoded Secrets             | PASS   | --       | `npm run security:secrets` passed for 2282 tracked text files.                                              |
| Sensitive Data Exposure       | PASS   | --       | Scrying and alert labels are bounded/product-facing; channeling token aria text avoids raw mission prompts. |
| Insecure Dependencies         | PASS   | --       | No dependency or lockfile change was introduced by this session.                                            |
| Security Misconfiguration     | PASS   | --       | No debug mode, CORS, header, route, hosted service, or config behavior changed.                             |

### Security Findings

No security findings.

## GDPR Compliance Assessment

### Overall: N/A

*N/A because this session introduced presentation-only battlefield state derived from existing heroes, missions, event logs, and projection data; it added no personal-data collection, storage, transfer, consent flow, or deletion path.*

**Categories reviewed**: Data Collection & Purpose, Consent Mechanism, Data Minimization, Right to Erasure, PII in Logs, Third-Party Data Transfers.

### Personal Data Inventory

No personal data collected or processed in this session.

### GDPR Findings

No GDPR findings.

## Recommendations

None -- session is compliant.

## Sign-Off

* **Result**: PASS
* **Reviewed by**: AI validation (validate)
* **Date**: 2026-07-08


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/.spec_system/specs/phase24-session05-scrying-and-alert-focus/security-compliance.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.