> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase23-session04-store-persistence-boundaries/security-compliance.md).

# Security & Compliance Report

**Session ID**: `phase23-session04-store-persistence-boundaries` **Package**: apps/web **Reviewed**: 2026-07-05 **Result**: PASS

## Scope

**Files reviewed**:

* `apps/web/tests/gameProjectionStore.test.ts` - store-level scanner camp persistence, replay, mock, hydration, reset, and storage-key regressions.
* `apps/web/tests/localErasure.test.ts` - browser-local erasure projection-key and camp-storage inventory regressions.
* `.spec_system/state.json` - spec workflow state tracking.
* `.spec_system/specs/phase23-session04-store-persistence-boundaries/spec.md` - session scope and requirements.
* `.spec_system/specs/phase23-session04-store-persistence-boundaries/tasks.md` - completed task checklist.
* `.spec_system/specs/phase23-session04-store-persistence-boundaries/implementation-notes.md` - implementation evidence log.
* `.spec_system/specs/phase23-session04-store-persistence-boundaries/code-review.md` - review and repair report.

**Context inspected**:

* `apps/web/src/lib/gameProjection.ts` - existing projection storage key and persistence helpers.
* `apps/web/src/lib/localErasure.ts` - existing browser-local erasure inventory.
* `apps/web/src/store/useGameStore.ts` - existing store reset and projection flush paths.

**Review method**: Static analysis of touched session files, targeted inspection of the existing app boundary they test, dependency-change check, and execution of focused plus repo-root test gates.

**Review evidence**:

* Command/check: `git diff --name-only 83924f9b9b19aaa775fc91b6a9ea8cafef7b0e96 -- package.json package-lock.json apps/web/package.json apps/web/package-lock.json`
  * Result: PASS - no dependency manifest or lockfile changes.
  * Evidence: command produced no output.
* Command/check: `rg -n "makeStoreCampSnapshot|expectSerializedProjectionOmitsRawScannerValues|expectNoCampSpecificStorageKeys|replay|mock|hydrate|clean snapshot|resetToSeed|GAME_PROJECTION_STORAGE_KEY|scanner" apps/web/tests/gameProjectionStore.test.ts`
  * Result: PASS - changed store tests assert aggregate-only persistence, replay and mock non-persistence, hydration reconciliation, reset cleanup, and no camp-specific storage keys.
  * Evidence: relevant assertions are present in the changed test file.
* Command/check: `rg -n "CAMP_SPECIFIC_STORAGE_KEY_PATTERN|expectNoCampSpecificBrowserStorageKeys|GAME_PROJECTION_STORAGE_KEY|executeBrowserErasure|secret-token|camp" apps/web/tests/localErasure.test.ts`
  * Result: PASS - changed erasure tests assert projection-key removal, no camp-specific browser storage keys, and value-free idempotency summaries.
  * Evidence: relevant assertions are present in the changed test file.
* Command/check: `rg -n "database|migration|schema|sql|drizzle|prisma|typeorm|sqlite|postgres|indexedDB|localStorage|GAME_PROJECTION_STORAGE_KEY" apps/web/tests/gameProjectionStore.test.ts apps/web/tests/localErasure.test.ts apps/web/src/store/useGameStore.ts apps/web/src/lib/gameProjection.ts apps/web/src/lib/localErasure.ts`
  * Result: PASS - touched behavior is browser `localStorage` projection coverage only; no database layer, migrations, SQL, ORM, or IndexedDB changes.
  * Evidence: storage references use `GAME_PROJECTION_STORAGE_KEY` and existing local erasure paths.
* Command/check: `npx -y -p node@26.2.0 -p npm@11.16.0 npm test -- apps/web/tests/gameProjectionStore.test.ts apps/web/tests/localErasure.test.ts`
  * Result: PASS - 2 files passed, 31 tests passed.
  * Evidence: focused web persistence and erasure regressions passed.
* Command/check: `npx -y -p node@26.2.0 -p npm@11.16.0 npm test`
  * Result: PASS - 278 files passed, 1 skipped; 3233 tests passed, 1 skipped.
  * Evidence: repo-root Vitest suite exited 0.

## Security Assessment

### Overall: PASS

| Category                      | Status | Severity | Details                                                                                                                                                       |
| ----------------------------- | ------ | -------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Injection (SQLi, CMDi, LDAPi) | PASS   | --       | No SQL, shell, LDAP, database, route, or command execution path was added or modified.                                                                        |
| Hardcoded Secrets             | PASS   | --       | Test fixtures include literal sentinel strings such as `secret-token` only to assert redaction/value omission; no credentials or usable keys were introduced. |
| Sensitive Data Exposure       | PASS   | --       | Added tests assert raw scanner payloads, raw projection payloads, and secret-like sentinel values are absent from serialized projection or erasure summaries. |
| Insecure Dependencies         | PASS   | --       | No package manifest or lockfile changed, so no session dependency addition was introduced.                                                                    |
| Security Misconfiguration     | PASS   | --       | No runtime config, CORS, auth, header, debug-mode, or deployment setting changed.                                                                             |
| Database Security             | PASS   | --       | No database layer exists in scope for this session; no migrations, SQL, ORM, or indexed storage changes were made.                                            |

### Security Findings

No security findings.

## GDPR Compliance Assessment

### Overall: N/A

*N/A because this session added tests and workflow artifacts only. It introduced no new personal data collection, storage, processing, logging, transfer, or deletion path.*

**Categories reviewed**: Data Collection & Purpose, Consent Mechanism, Data Minimization, Right to Erasure, PII in Logs, Third-Party Data Transfers.

### Personal Data Inventory

No personal data collected or processed in this session.

### GDPR Findings

No GDPR findings.

## Recommendations

None - session is compliant.

## Sign-Off

* **Result**: PASS
* **Reviewed by**: AI validation (validate)
* **Date**: 2026-07-05


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase23-session04-store-persistence-boundaries/security-compliance.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.