> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase22-session07-honesty-regression-tests/implementation_summary.md).

# Implementation Summary

**Session ID**: `phase22-session07-honesty-regression-tests` **Package**: apps/web **Completed**: 2026-07-05 **Duration**: 0.6 hours

***

## Overview

Session 07 added focused projection honesty regression coverage for the `apps/web` game projection boundary. The new tests prove shared replay, reconnect snapshots, mock traffic, and serialized aggregate output cannot mint or persist durable progress counters outside the projection authority.

***

## Deliverables

### Files Created

| File                                                                                      | Purpose                                | Lines |
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------- | ----- |
| `.spec_system/specs/phase22-session07-honesty-regression-tests/spec.md`                   | Session scope and acceptance criteria  | \~304 |
| `.spec_system/specs/phase22-session07-honesty-regression-tests/tasks.md`                  | Task checklist and completion state    | \~62  |
| `.spec_system/specs/phase22-session07-honesty-regression-tests/implementation-notes.md`   | Implementation evidence log            | \~555 |
| `.spec_system/specs/phase22-session07-honesty-regression-tests/code-review.md`            | Code review findings and resolution    | \~69  |
| `.spec_system/specs/phase22-session07-honesty-regression-tests/security-compliance.md`    | Security and GDPR review               | \~76  |
| `.spec_system/specs/phase22-session07-honesty-regression-tests/validation.md`             | Validation report and command evidence | \~182 |
| `.spec_system/specs/phase22-session07-honesty-regression-tests/IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md` | Session closeout summary               | \~70  |

### Files Modified

| File                                         | Changes                                                                                                             |
| -------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| `apps/web/tests/gameProjection.test.ts`      | Added durable progress snapshot helpers and reducer-level replay, reconnect, and serialization honesty regressions. |
| `apps/web/tests/gameProjectionStore.test.ts` | Added persisted projection fixtures plus shared replay and mock no-persist store regressions.                       |

***

## Technical Decisions

1. **Public replay seam coverage**: Store-level replay tests use `dispatchReplayEntries()` and the store `applyEvent()` path so the guard is proven through the same public seam as replay playback.
2. **Durable progress snapshots**: Tests compare XP, levels, titles, banners, wraith kills, essence, and War Tide counters before and after replay and reconnect paths to catch accidental progress minting.
3. **Mock persistence boundary**: Mock-mode coverage allows the implemented in-memory fold behavior while asserting `factionos-game-v1` stays unchanged.
4. **Aggregate-only serialization**: Serialization assertions exclude replay entries, transient presentation queues, prompts, broad paths, terminal output, file contents, provider payloads, tokens, and secrets.

***

## Test Results

| Metric         | Value                  |
| -------------- | ---------------------- |
| Focused Tests  | 59                     |
| Focused Passed | 59                     |
| Root Tests     | 3207                   |
| Root Passed    | 3206 passed, 1 skipped |
| Coverage       | Not collected          |

***

## Lessons Learned

1. Projection honesty is best guarded with narrow invariant tests that snapshot only durable aggregate counters.
2. The shared replay helper is the right integration seam for no-feedback-loop persistence coverage.
3. Fake sensitive sentinel data is useful for proving aggregate serialization stays bounded without introducing real secrets.

***

## Future Considerations

Items for future sessions:

1. Session 08 should finish local erasure inventory and documentation for `factionos-game-v1`.
2. Later presentation phases should continue reading projection state rather than adding alternate progress authorities.
3. Future projection fields should extend the same replay, mock, reconnect, persistence, and serialization honesty coverage.

***

## Session Statistics

* **Tasks**: 16 completed
* **Files Created**: 7
* **Files Modified**: 2
* **Tests Added**: 4 new tests and 1 extended serialization regression
* **Blockers**: 0 resolved


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase22-session07-honesty-regression-tests/implementation_summary.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.