> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase20-session01-truthful-capability-baseline/security-compliance.md).

# Security & Compliance Report

**Session ID**: `phase20-session01-truthful-capability-baseline` **Package**: null (cross-cutting) **Reviewed**: 2026-06-28 **Result**: PASS

## Scope

**Files reviewed** (session source, test, doc, and review-repair files):

* `packages/protocol/src/orchestrationCommandCenter.ts` - protocol status vocabulary deliverable; existing file unchanged in current diff
* `apps/server/src/managers/executorRegistry.ts` - executor capability and guarded approval behavior
* `apps/server/tests/executorRegistry.test.ts` - executor registry coverage
* `apps/server/tests/guardedActions.test.ts` - guarded action route coverage
* `apps/server/tests/commandCenterRoutes.test.ts` - command-center route coverage
* `apps/web/src/lib/commandCenterUi.ts` - command-center UI copy helpers
* `apps/web/src/components/orchestration/QueueWorkbench.tsx` - queue record controls
* `apps/web/src/components/orchestration/CampaignWorkbench.tsx` - campaign tracking controls
* `apps/web/src/components/orchestration/HeroLineageWorkbench.tsx` - hero lifecycle intent controls
* `apps/web/src/components/orchestration/OrchestrationShell.tsx` - campaign tracking toast repair
* `apps/web/tests/commandCenterUi.test.ts` - UI helper tests
* `apps/web/tests/CommandCenterPanes.test.tsx` - integrated command-center pane tests
* `apps/web/tests/HeroLineageWorkbench.test.tsx` - hero lifecycle rendered tests
* `apps/web/tests/OrchestrationPanel.test.tsx` - orchestration shell toast test
* `docs/api/README_api.md` - API docs
* `docs/api/event-api-hook-contracts.md` - event and hook API docs
* `apps/web/README_web.md` - web UX docs
* `docs/ARCHITECTURE.md` - architecture docs

**Review method**: Static analysis of session source, tests, and docs; focused security search; dependency-manifest diff check; validation test and lint gates.

**Review evidence**:

* Command/check: `rg -n "process\.env|API_KEY|TOKEN|SECRET|PASSWORD|child_process|exec\(|spawn\(|eval\(|new Function|innerHTML|dangerouslySetInnerHTML|localStorage|console\.log|console\.error|raw|stack|absolute|password|email|user" apps/server/src/managers/executorRegistry.ts apps/web/src/lib/commandCenterUi.ts apps/web/src/components/orchestration/QueueWorkbench.tsx apps/web/src/components/orchestration/CampaignWorkbench.tsx apps/web/src/components/orchestration/HeroLineageWorkbench.tsx apps/web/src/components/orchestration/OrchestrationShell.tsx docs/api/README_api.md docs/api/event-api-hook-contracts.md apps/web/README_web.md docs/ARCHITECTURE.md`
  * Result: PASS - no new unsafe execution APIs, hardcoded secret values, raw HTML sinks, or logging sinks were introduced in touched runtime files; documentation hits are boundary statements and placeholder env var names.
  * Evidence: Runtime hits were limited to existing local state terms and safe raw-data rejection/redaction helpers such as `safeCommandCenterLabel`, blocked raw payload messages, and documented "must not expose raw" copy.
* Command/check: `git diff --name-only HEAD -- package.json package-lock.json apps/*/package.json packages/*/package.json public-demo/package.json public-website/package.json`
  * Result: PASS - no dependency manifests changed.
  * Evidence: Command produced no output.
* Command/check: `npx vitest run apps/server/tests/executorRegistry.test.ts apps/server/tests/guardedActions.test.ts apps/server/tests/commandCenterRoutes.test.ts apps/web/tests/commandCenterUi.test.ts apps/web/tests/CommandCenterPanes.test.tsx apps/web/tests/HeroLineageWorkbench.test.tsx apps/web/tests/OrchestrationPanel.test.tsx`
  * Result: PASS - 7 files and 65 tests passed, including raw payload, secret token, broad path, and product-surface assertions.
  * Evidence: Vitest output reported `Test Files 7 passed (7)` and `Tests 65 passed (65)`.
* Command/check: `npm test`
  * Result: PASS - full Vitest suite passed.
  * Evidence: Vitest output reported `Test Files 263 passed | 1 skipped (264)` and `Tests 2983 passed | 1 skipped (2984)`.
* Command/check: `npm run lint`
  * Result: PASS - Biome lint found no issues.
  * Evidence: Biome reported `Checked 757 files ... No fixes applied.`

## Security Assessment

### Overall: PASS

| Category                      | Status | Severity | Details                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| ----------------------------- | ------ | -------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Injection (SQLi, CMDi, LDAPi) | PASS   | --       | No SQL/database layer exists for this session; static search found no new shell execution, eval, function-constructor, or raw HTML sink in touched runtime files.                                                                           |
| Hardcoded Secrets             | PASS   | --       | Static search found no hardcoded secret values in touched runtime files; documentation mentions env var names as configuration references only.                                                                                             |
| Sensitive Data Exposure       | PASS   | --       | Server and web tests assert redaction/no raw payload behavior; touched docs reinforce no raw prompts, command bodies, terminal output, diffs, file contents, provider payloads, tokens, secrets, or broad absolute paths in broad surfaces. |
| Insecure Dependencies         | PASS   | --       | No dependency manifests changed, so no new package risk was introduced by this session.                                                                                                                                                     |
| Security Misconfiguration     | PASS   | --       | No auth, CORS, hosted, debug, or deployment configuration changed; product-surface checks found no debug/readiness/scaffolding diagnostics added to normal UI.                                                                              |

### Security Findings

No security findings.

## GDPR Compliance Assessment

### Overall: N/A

*N/A because this session changed executor posture, product copy, tests, and docs without adding new personal data collection, storage, consent, transfer, or erasure behavior.*

**Categories reviewed**: Data Collection & Purpose, Consent Mechanism, Data Minimization, Right to Erasure, PII in Logs, Third-Party Data Transfers.

### Personal Data Inventory

No personal data collected or processed in this session.

### GDPR Findings

No GDPR findings.

## Recommendations

None -- session is compliant.

## Sign-Off

* **Result**: PASS
* **Reviewed by**: AI validation (validate)
* **Date**: 2026-06-28


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase20-session01-truthful-capability-baseline/security-compliance.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
