> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase06-session04-collaborative-cockpit-ux-and-remote-context/implementation_summary.md). # Implementation Summary **Session ID**: `phase06-session04-collaborative-cockpit-ux-and-remote-context` **Package**: `apps/web` **Completed**: 2026-05-30 **Duration**: 0.5 hours *** ## Overview Implemented the Phase 06 collaborative cockpit UX for the web War Room surface. The session made authority, role, lifecycle, reconnect, leave, reset, remote-context, and safe notice states visible without implying hosted identity or mutating local source-of-truth state. It also tightened duplicate-action guards and added focused helper, store, component, and Playwright coverage for the shipped collaboration surface. *** ## Deliverables ### Files Created | File | Purpose | Lines | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------- | ----- | | `.spec_system/specs/phase06-session04-collaborative-cockpit-ux-and-remote-context/validation.md` | Session validation report and pass evidence | \~35 | | `.spec_system/specs/phase06-session04-collaborative-cockpit-ux-and-remote-context/IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md` | Session closeout summary | \~90 | ### Files Modified | File | Changes | | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | `apps/web/src/lib/warRoomUi.ts` | Refined lifecycle, authority, role, notice, and failure copy helpers | | `apps/web/src/lib/warRoomPresence.ts` | Refined roster and approval row derivation, ordering, and disabled-copy behavior | | `apps/web/src/lib/warRoomFederation.ts` | Refined safe summary, notice helper, and remote-context pruning behavior | | `apps/web/src/store/useWarRoomStore.ts` | Hardened duplicate guards, revalidation, authority failure handling, and remote-context cleanup | | `apps/web/src/components/WarRoomPanel.tsx` | Rendered clearer lifecycle, authority, room-control, and remote-context UX | | `apps/web/src/components/WarRoomApprovalQueue.tsx` | Tightened decision failure copy, busy states, and disabled control behavior | | `apps/web/src/components/WarRoomRoster.tsx` | Tightened participant role/status display and accessible labels | | `apps/web/src/components/battlefield/RemoteParticipantOverlay.tsx` | Kept remote markers separate from local source-of-truth state | | `apps/web/tests/warRoomPresence.test.ts` | Added role, disabled, and reconnect copy coverage | | `apps/web/tests/warRoomFederation.test.ts` | Added remote summary, notice helper, and redaction coverage | | `apps/web/tests/warRoomStore.test.ts` | Added duplicate-guard, revalidation, and authority-failure coverage | | `apps/web/tests/WarRoomPanel.test.tsx` | Added lifecycle, authority, notice, and accessibility coverage | | `apps/web/tests/WarRoomBattlefieldOverlay.test.tsx` | Added remote-overlay separation coverage | | `tests/e2e/app.e2e.ts` | Extended retained desktop/mobile War Room evidence coverage | | `apps/web/README_web.md` | Documented shipped collaboration UX and deferred scope | | `.spec_system/specs/phase06-session04-collaborative-cockpit-ux-and-remote-context/implementation-notes.md` | Recorded implementation progress and validation results | | `.spec_system/specs/phase06-session04-collaborative-cockpit-ux-and-remote-context/security-compliance.md` | Recorded security, privacy, and accessibility review | | `.spec_system/specs/phase06-session04-collaborative-cockpit-ux-and-remote-context/tasks.md` | Marked all tasks complete | | `package.json` | Bumped the root patch version | *** ## Technical Decisions 1. **Keep remote context separate from local truth**: collaboration overlays, safe summaries, and battlefield markers remain visibly remote so they cannot imply control of local hero, mission, or settings state. 2. **Scope failures to the requester**: approve and reject failures now surface on the affected pending row as well as globally, which makes authority problems easier to diagnose without exposing raw payloads. 3. **Use allowlisted notice content**: room notices are constrained to safe frame content and bounded user-facing error copy so raw sensitive input never becomes part of the shipped UI state. *** ## Test Results | Metric | Value | | -------- | ------------------------------------------------- | | Tests | 7 commands | | Passed | 7/7 | | Coverage | 49 Vitest tests plus 2 Playwright evidence checks | *** ## Lessons Learned 1. Duplicate-trigger guards need to exist in both the store and the UI so busy collaboration flows stay deterministic. 2. Retained browser evidence is most useful when it covers both the happy path and the failure and reset states that operators need to recognize quickly. *** ## Future Considerations Items for future sessions: 1. Continue with Session 05 isolation boundary diagnostics without widening collaboration scope. 2. Keep mobile hardening and accessibility validation separate so the collaboration UX stays stable while the next surface is tuned. *** ## Session Statistics * **Tasks**: 22 completed * **Files Created**: 2 * **Files Modified**: 18 * **Tests Added**: 0 * **Blockers**: 0 resolved --- # Agent Instructions This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com. ## Querying This Documentation If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question. Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter: ``` GET https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase06-session04-collaborative-cockpit-ux-and-remote-context/implementation_summary.md?ask=&goal= ``` `ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language. `goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal. The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation. Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.