> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase02-session05-battlefield-asset-and-public-demo-parity/security-compliance.md). # Security & Compliance Report **Session ID**: `phase02-session05-battlefield-asset-and-public-demo-parity` **Package**: Cross-cutting (`apps/web`, `public-demo`, docs, scripts) **Reviewed**: 2026-05-29 **Result**: PASS *** ## Scope **Files reviewed** (session deliverables only): * `scripts/check-battlefield-assets.mjs` - deterministic asset parity and boundary checks * `public-demo/index.html` - standalone demo battlefield behavior and limitation copy * `public-demo/sw.js` - shell precache and cache versioning * `tests/e2e/support/browserGuards.ts` - browser request failure reporting * `tests/e2e/public-demo.e2e.ts` - public demo behavior coverage * `tests/e2e/app.e2e.ts` - app battlefield parity coverage * `public-demo/README_public-demo.md` - public demo boundary and deployment guidance * `docs/battlefield.md` - battlefield contract documentation * `docs/media-assets.md` - asset provenance and budget documentation * `docs/public-demo-code-sharing.md` - standalone boundary and no-import guidance **Review method**: Static analysis of session deliverables, targeted test review, and dependency sanity check via the root test suite plus the targeted e2e runs. *** ## Security Assessment ### Overall: PASS | Category | Status | Severity | Details | | ----------------------------- | ------ | -------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Injection (SQLi, CMDi, LDAPi) | PASS | -- | No unsafe string interpolation into shell or query contexts was introduced in the scoped files. | | Hardcoded Secrets | PASS | -- | No secrets, tokens, or credentials were added. | | Sensitive Data Exposure | PASS | -- | The demo remains synthetic-only and does not add new PII logging or disclosure paths. | | Insecure Dependencies | PASS | -- | No new runtime dependencies were introduced. | | Misconfiguration | PASS | -- | No unsafe public exposure, permissive network change, or debug-mode configuration was added. | ### Findings No security findings. *** ## GDPR Assessment ### Overall: N/A This session does not introduce new personal-data collection, storage, or external transfer paths. | Category | Status | Details | | -------------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------------------------------- | | Data Collection & Purpose | N/A | No new personal data collection. | | Consent Mechanism | N/A | No new personal data collection. | | Data Minimization | N/A | No new personal data collection. | | Right to Erasure | N/A | No new personal data storage. | | PII in Logs | N/A | No PII logging paths were introduced. | | Third-Party Data Transfers | N/A | No new third-party data transfer paths were introduced. | ### Personal Data Inventory No personal data collected or processed in this session. ### Findings No GDPR findings. *** ## Behavioral Quality Spot-Check ### Overall: PASS This session produces application code and static demo behavior, so BQC applies. **Files spot-checked**: * `scripts/check-battlefield-assets.mjs` * `public-demo/index.html` * `public-demo/sw.js` * `tests/e2e/public-demo.e2e.ts` * `tests/e2e/app.e2e.ts` * `tests/e2e/support/browserGuards.ts` | Priority | Check | Status | Details | | -------- | -------------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | 1 | Trust boundary enforcement | PASS | The parity checker validates manifest shape, repository-root assumptions, and explicit paths before use. | | 2 | Resource cleanup | PASS | No new long-lived resource lifecycle issue was identified in the reviewed demo and test paths. | | 3 | Mutation safety | PASS | The demo selection and empty-board reset flows are user-driven and bounded by the existing UI state. | | 4 | Failure path completeness | PASS | Asset failures and request failures have explicit fallback or diagnostic handling. | | 5 | Contract alignment | PASS | The demo/app parity checks and Playwright expectations stay aligned with the current battlefield contract. | ### Violations Found None. *** ## Recommendations None. The reviewed session deliverables are compliant. *** ## Sign-Off * **Result**: PASS * **Reviewed by**: AI validation (validate) * **Date**: 2026-05-29 --- # Agent Instructions This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com. ## Querying This Documentation If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question. Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter: ``` GET https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase02-session05-battlefield-asset-and-public-demo-parity/security-compliance.md?ask=&goal= ``` `ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language. `goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal. The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation. Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.