> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase02-session05-battlefield-asset-and-public-demo-parity/implementation_summary.md). # Implementation Summary **Session ID**: `phase02-session05-battlefield-asset-and-public-demo-parity` **Package**: Cross-cutting (`apps/web`, `public-demo`, docs, scripts) **Completed**: 2026-05-29 **Duration**: 2-4 hours *** ## Overview This session validated and documented parity between the app battlefield asset set and the standalone public demo. It added a deterministic asset check, kept the demo's synthetic battlefield behavior and offline support aligned with the app contract, updated stable docs, and verified that the public demo remained a no-build artifact with no workspace imports. *** ## Deliverables ### Files Created | File | Purpose | Lines | | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | | `scripts/check-battlefield-assets.mjs` | Deterministic app/demo asset parity, service worker precache, byte-budget, and boundary checks | \~180 | | `.spec_system/specs/phase02-session05-battlefield-asset-and-public-demo-parity/IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md` | Session closeout summary | \~80 | ### Files Modified | File | Changes | | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | `package.json` | Added the root `battlefield:check` command and bumped the patch version | | `scripts/README_scripts.md` | Documented the new parity check command | | `tests/e2e/support/browserGuards.ts` | Strengthened asset request failure reporting | | `public-demo/index.html` | Aligned battlefield state labels, fallback behavior, selection clearing, and limitation copy | | `public-demo/sw.js` | Updated or verified the precache list and cache version behavior | | `tests/e2e/public-demo.e2e.ts` | Extended coverage for asset loading, selection, fallbacks, offline reload, and limitation copy | | `tests/e2e/app.e2e.ts` | Confirmed app battlefield loading and visible state expectations | | `public-demo/README_public-demo.md` | Documented demo battlefield behavior and constraints | | `public-demo/docs_public-demo/validation.md` | Added parity and offline validation steps | | `public-demo/docs_public-demo/maintenance.md` | Recorded parity check usage after asset changes | | `docs/public-demo-code-sharing.md` | Clarified no-import parity maintenance rules | | `docs/battlefield.md` | Updated app/demo parity and validation guidance | | `docs/media-assets.md` | Confirmed asset measurements and validation references | | `.spec_system/specs/phase02-session05-battlefield-asset-and-public-demo-parity/spec.md` | Marked the session complete | | `.spec_system/PRD/phase_02/PRD_phase_02.md` | Marked Session 05 complete and updated phase progress | | `.spec_system/state.json` | Cleared the current session and recorded completion | *** ## Technical Decisions 1. **Explicit asset parity checks**: The session used a deterministic Node script rather than relying only on browser inspection so drift can fail fast at the repo root. 2. **Standalone demo boundary**: The public demo stayed as plain browser code with synthetic data and no workspace imports to preserve no-build compatibility. *** ## Test Results | Metric | Value | | -------- | ---------------- | | Tests | 5 command groups | | Passed | 5 | | Coverage | N/A | *** ## Lessons Learned 1. Asset drift is easier to catch when the expected app and demo paths are treated as explicit project data. 2. Offline demo validation needs a fresh browser context and a prior online visit to exercise cache behavior reliably. *** ## Future Considerations Items for future sessions: 1. Keep the parity check and demo docs updated whenever the battlefield asset set changes. 2. Re-run the public demo offline flow after any service worker or shell asset update. *** ## Session Statistics * **Tasks**: 20 completed * **Files Created**: 2 * **Files Modified**: 14+ * **Tests Added**: 2 * **Blockers**: 0 resolved --- # Agent Instructions This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com. ## Querying This Documentation If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question. Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter: ``` GET https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase02-session05-battlefield-asset-and-public-demo-parity/implementation_summary.md?ask=&goal= ``` `ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language. `goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal. The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation. Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.