> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase01-session07-runtime-contract-documentation/implementation_summary.md). # Implementation Summary **Session ID**: `phase01-session07-runtime-contract-documentation` **Package**: Cross-package documentation **Completed**: 2026-05-29 **Duration**: 0.75 hours *** ## Overview Closed Phase 01 by aligning stable documentation with the runtime contracts hardened in Sessions 01 through 06. Stable docs now describe the current shipped, tested-shipped, stubbed, planned, unsupported, obsolete, and separate-surface runtime behavior without using ignored `EXAMPLES/` content as user-facing product guidance. Legacy consolidation now records Phase 01 session outcomes, source-intake coverage, and remaining dependencies for future phases. *** ## Deliverables ### Files Created | File | Purpose | | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- | | `.spec_system/specs/phase01-session07-runtime-contract-documentation/implementation-notes.md` | Session documentation log and verification record | | `.spec_system/specs/phase01-session07-runtime-contract-documentation/security-compliance.md` | Session security and GDPR report | | `.spec_system/specs/phase01-session07-runtime-contract-documentation/validation.md` | Session validation report | | `.spec_system/specs/phase01-session07-runtime-contract-documentation/IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md` | Session closure summary | ### Files Modified | File | Changes | | -------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | `README.md` | Updated Phase 01 shipped capabilities and known gaps | | `apps/cli/README_cli.md` | Clarified stable docs versus historical package snapshots | | `apps/hooks/README_hooks.md` | Clarified Phase 01 hook/listener coverage and future orchestration boundary | | `apps/server/README_server.md` | Added LLM inputs to compact validation surface list | | `packages/protocol/README_protocol.md` | Added Phase 01 runtime coverage summary | | `docs/api/event-api-hook-contracts.md` | Updated final Phase 01 hardening summary and historical classifications | | `docs/ARCHITECTURE.md` | Updated optional services, scan/redaction boundaries, and current gaps | | `docs/development.md` | Added LLM provider-transfer and scan-root environment behavior | | `docs/privacy-and-security.md` | Refined remaining local retention/erasure risk | | `docs/legacy-consolidation.md` | Added Phase 01 session outcomes and source-intake coverage table | | `docs/release.md` | Added provider-transfer and redaction release checks | | `docs/README_docs.md` | Clarified Phase 01 local runtime capture and future cleanup gates | | `package.json` | Bumped project version from `0.1.29` to `0.1.30` | | `package-lock.json` | Bumped lockfile versions from `0.1.29` to `0.1.30` | | `packages/protocol/src/index.ts` | Bumped exported runtime version from `0.1.29` to `0.1.30` | *** ## Technical Decisions 1. **Stable docs as current contract**: Historical source paths remain traceability evidence, while current behavior is anchored in README files, API docs, architecture, privacy, and legacy consolidation. 2. **Phase 01 complete, not release complete**: Docs mark local runtime hardening complete for current surfaces while preserving future-route, erasure, War Room, orchestration, hosted, media, and cleanup gaps. 3. **No historical deletion**: This session records coverage and remaining dependencies but leaves cleanup to Phase 08 gates. *** ## Test Results | Check | Result | | ------------------------- | ----------------------------- | | Stale-claim grep | PASS | | Markdown path spot checks | PASS | | Protocol typecheck | PASS | | Workspace typecheck | PASS | | Full Vitest | PASS - 1752 passed, 1 skipped | | Format check | PASS | | `git diff --check` | PASS | | ASCII/LF validation | PASS for touched files | *** ## Lessons Learned 1. Closing implementation sessions still leaves stale gap language unless docs get a final contract pass. 2. Source-intake traceability is useful when it is summarized by disposition and owner, not copied as historical detail. 3. Phase completion docs should distinguish "current local runtime complete" from "release complete" to avoid hiding future erasure and hosted-surface work. *** ## Future Considerations Items for future sessions: 1. Phase 02 should start from the stable local runtime contract rather than old `docs/PROGRESS.md` phase labels. 2. Phasebuild for later phases should use the `docs/legacy-consolidation.md` source-intake coverage table to avoid duplicating Phase 01 work. 3. Phase 08 should revisit decommission gates before deleting or reducing historical intake. *** ## Session Statistics * **Tasks**: 16 completed * **Files Created**: 4 * **Files Modified**: 15 * **Tests Added**: 0 * **Blockers**: 0 --- # Agent Instructions This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com. ## Querying This Documentation If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question. Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter: ``` GET https://faction-os.gitbook.io/faction-os-docs/.spec_system/archive/sessions/phase01-session07-runtime-contract-documentation/implementation_summary.md?ask=&goal= ``` `ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language. `goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal. The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation. Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.